I haven’t read
James Michener in at least two decades and was surprised to find a book of his
that I hadn’t already read. But, I was looking for something about the history
of Hungary and I found this nonfiction book that he wrote in 1957, a year after
the Soviets crushed the Hungarian revolt against communist rule. I was aware
that the revolt had occurred, but knew nothing else about it. If the topic
interests you, then this is an excellent source of data about the exceedingly
brutal reaction that the Soviet’s had to the Hungarian rebellion. The Bridge at Andau is the story of the
rebellion, about 300 pages rather than one of Michener’s usual 1,000 page
tomes. His research was extensive and his stories of the real individuals on
both sides of the rebellion was graphic and moving.
 Michener wrote
in the forward, “In this book I propose to tell the story of a terror so
complete as to be deadening to the senses.” He achieved that goal. As is
typical of Michener, he did give some ancient history that helped understand
the people who occupied Hungary and how they were of a different genetic
heritage than other European countries. But the main action in the book was the
rebellion itself and the Soviet’s reaction to it. The author wrote of the
Russian response, “In areas already subdued, Russian tank crews ran wild and
roared their tanks through the streets, firing on any groups of civilians they
saw. There were three instances in which women in queues were shot to death….
Children were killed, hospitals were fired upon, and young men were executed
merely upon suspicion.”
Michener wrote
in the forward, “In this book I propose to tell the story of a terror so
complete as to be deadening to the senses.” He achieved that goal. As is
typical of Michener, he did give some ancient history that helped understand
the people who occupied Hungary and how they were of a different genetic
heritage than other European countries. But the main action in the book was the
rebellion itself and the Soviet’s reaction to it. The author wrote of the
Russian response, “In areas already subdued, Russian tank crews ran wild and
roared their tanks through the streets, firing on any groups of civilians they
saw. There were three instances in which women in queues were shot to death….
Children were killed, hospitals were fired upon, and young men were executed
merely upon suspicion.”
The bridge
itself was in a remote section of Hungary that bordered Austria. It was a place
where Hungarian citizens could flee to the safety of a country that welcomed
them, but it was remarkably dangerous. Still, some 20,000 people were able to
make it across the bridge before the communists dynamited it. Although Russia
did crush the rebellion, in 1957 Michener saw that they would eventually lose
the overall war. If the Hungarians were trying to throw off the yoke of
communist oppression, the author commented that the communist system was sure
to falter although he had no idea how and when that would come about. I would
not have found this book had I not been headed to Hungary, and although the
brutality that was described was difficult to read, the book provided precisely
the historical background that I was looking for.

 
No comments:
Post a Comment