
But, what does that have to do with the title “11/22/63,”
which was the day John Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas? Al Templeton owned
Al’s Diner in Lisbon where Jake sometimes stopped to eat Al’s famed burgers.
Jake was greatly surprised when Al called and asked Jake to come by, and it was
then Jake learned that Al was close to death from cancer. He also learned Al’s
dark secret, that there was a time travel portal hidden in the old diner. Al
was fixated on the notion that the world would be a much better place in 2011 if
Kennedy had remained alive. He assumed that the Vietnam War would never have
happened, and that Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy would not have been
killed. But, he was dying and no longer had the strength to carry out his plan
to save Kennedy, and he wanted Jake to do it.
Stephen King talks about the “butterfly effect,” something
well known to physicists in the dialogue about time travel, the notion that if
one were able to do time travel and made the most minimal of changes, like
killing a butterfly, that there would be a cascade of events that followed that
might change everything. Such a series of events might even prevent the birth
of the person who was making the changes. Before Jake took on the task of saving
Kennedy, he had to prove to himself that he could make changes that worked,
that were lasting. So, he went back to the past and saved Hoptoad Harry and his
family. However, upon Jakes return to the future, he learned that instead of
Harry losing his family and being disabled for life, a very healthy Harry was
inducted into the U.S. Army and was killed during the Vietnamese Tet offensive
in 1968. Nonetheless, Jake took on the task of saving Kennedy.
I’m not normally a fan of Stephen King, but this book was recommended
to me by my sister, who rarely gives me bad advice. (There must have been a
time, but I don’t remember it.) The date of Kennedy’s death just happened to be
her 16th birthday, and I vividly remember learning of his death and
the gloom that hung over the family’s planned birthday celebration. Also, I’m
admittedly captured by stories about time travel, and while this book does not
live up to the writing in “The Little Book” by Selden Edwards, it was a most
enjoyable read. King captured what life was like in the 50s and 60s, a simpler
time when trust among strangers was possible. King introduced a series of
believable and well-developed characters to surround the protagonist and
support the many subplots. The action was fast-paced, in part based on his
premise that, “The past is obdurate. It doesn’t want to be changed.” This is a
long book, nearly 900 pages, and I was sorry when it came to a close. I thought
I knew what King would do in order to bring the main plot and subplots to a
conclusion, but I was wrong – he disguised that to the end. Thanks to my sister
for the recommendation. This book gets my recommendation, too.
No comments:
Post a Comment